Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curse of Norm Smith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Norm Smith. MBisanz ^talk 01:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Curse of Norm Smith[edit]

Another curse that fails WP:NOR, and like all these other curse of x I nominated, can't find much on google that it's a real "curse" Delete Secret ^account 21:44, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources. No indications this is a notable "curse". Edward321 (talk) 01:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep The article "Norm Smith recognised as an AFL legend" from The Age, states that "Smith publicly expressed his regret about the sacking in a famous television interview and it is part of club folklore that they have not won a premiership since '64 because of 'the curse of Norm Smith'." Also see "Curse of Socceroos has finally been broken" and "AFL: Jackson defends Norm Smith award" which are some of the other articles that discuss the curse. I'm not sure that Google is great at picking up Australian articles and I would assume that there are more that I'm not finding. This and other sources should be added to the article. Alansohn (talk) 14:16, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 05:00, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Google returns less than 100 results for this term, excluding Wikipedia pages. A page at Fox Sports describes the curse as "club folklore." Luinfana (talk) 06:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Canley (talk) 05:08, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Whislt some of the other articles found and listed above could be challenged as trivial coverage or not reliable sources, I think Norm Smith and the curse of the Demons is a very reliable, non-trivial secondary source. The-Pope (talk) 12:16, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Norm Smith article. All the sources found so far convince me it needs to be covered, but the Norm Smith article isn't so lang as to encourage a split off. (I'm sure the current curse article can be shortened). - Mgm|^(talk) 23:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Mgml. It's a valid search term and it's where the material belongs, no need for a separate article. StarM 20:15, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Happy ^Holidays 14:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge' with the article on the person. No possible independent notability. DGG (talk) 19:11, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I have a problem with the merge idea, as the article on a legend of the game (he elevated to legend status in the Australian Football Hall of Fame in 2007) should not include a list of "appearances of the curse", ie times in the past 50 years when Melbourne has failed. It should only include what it currently has, a mention (and link) of it in the section on Smith getting the sack (what caused the "curse" to be imposed). The inclusion in the category of Category:Sports-related curses will also be lost in a merge. Of course curse articles are prone to WP:OR, but that should be dealt with within the article with {{fact}} tags, not by deletion. The-Pope (talk) 12:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.