Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crusty Demons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:03, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crusty Demons[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches found no good sources or signs of improvement here, here, here and here, there are articles saying they're "highly sucessful" and such but no good and in-depth coverage. I'm also not seeing a good target for moving elsewhere. SwisterTwister talk 04:38, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - a google news search produced what appears to be enough substantial coverage to warrant passing WP:GNG, such as this, this, this, and to a lesser extent this. While this isn't in-depth coverage, I believe it does go to the notability of the group. Article definitely needs improvement. In addition, there are enough tangential mentions of the group and how they affected later riders to warrant inclusion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:09, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.