Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crown for Christmas

Crown for Christmas[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Vaticidalprophet (talk) 03:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television film, no significant coverage from independent sources, per WP:NF and WP:GNG BOVINEBOY2008 10:33, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:38, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Brad Krevoy#Christmas and Family Movies (2013–present). Foxnpichu (talk) 11:39, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Dutch review at [[1]] Donaldd23 (talk) 12:02, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This movie lacked sources. I have improved a bit by adding more info and sources. A Google search will being over 5 pages of results mentioning the movie, so I feel there is significant coverage. Expertwikiguy (talk) 19:56, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Many of the sources that you added to the article are not what I would call significant coverage. Some of them literally just mention the film in a list of titles, others have a short plot summary in a listicle-type article about general Hallmark Christmas films. BOVINEBOY2008 20:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is actually 15 pages of Google News results for this movie. I have not checked every single one, but most of the ones that I checked had a description of the film. Based on so much coverage, I decided to vote keep. Expertwikiguy (talk) 10:32, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Those suggesting there is notability might be advised to present their three strongest sources.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep This high-end, international film production is solidly notable and *not* your average Hallmark holiday flick. Like Expertwikiguy said, a quick Google search proves how popular this movie is. Turner Classic Movies lists it, Hollywood's KTLA covers it, and the UK's The Independent has it as the news article's cover. Cordially, History DMZ ^{(talk)+(ping)} 23:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- With all do respect, TCM has entries for most Hallmark movies (see https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/2084498/12-Gifts-of-Christmas/, http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/2084521/Once-Upon-a-Holiday/, https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/2084511/enwp, etc), KTLA looks like it is just a listing of the film (not significant coverage), and the Independent doesn't even mention the film by name except for in one caption of an image about a larger conversation about Christmas TV movies.

Like I said, this is an internationally notable film, in the US/Canada, UK, and Netherlands like Donaldd23 stated above. It appears on Parade (magazine), see here, also TCM lists a few (not all thousands of Hallmark movies) and the KTLA link is a video interview, not a listing. This film even has articles in German and Portuguese Wikipedia plus its Wikidata entry with more sources. This is clearly a speedy keep. Cordially, History DMZ ^{(talk)+(ping)} 03:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.