Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornelius Keagon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Berean Hunter, CSD G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:28, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Cornelius Keagon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Cornelius Keagon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article fails WP:GNG, WP:JOURNALIST and WP:ANYBIO. Two of the three sources cited in the article do not discuss the subject. The first source is an unreliable self-published wordpress source. A Google search of the subject doesn't show him being discussed in reliable sources.  Versace1608  ^{Wanna Talk?} 19:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  ^{Wanna Talk?} 19:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  ^{Wanna Talk?} 19:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 December 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:23, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

• Keep Article needs better sourcing but the subject is notable locally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djames11170 (talk • contribs) 12:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

• Keep in accordance with WP:BEFORE #2, as it is the case that this article was recently created, contributors should be given more time to develop the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djames11170 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

You only are allowed one vote in an AfD. GPL93 (talk) 14:24, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Lacking significant enough coverage in reliable sources to meet GNG. The article is bordering on speedy delete territory if you ask me. GPL93 (talk) 14:24, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
• Delete, no reliable sources provided, none found. Obvious COI editor. I've removed some unsourced material ("womanizer" junk), but left other material so that this can play out the long way. Kuru (talk) 14:50, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.