Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coopism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per DGG --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coopism[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NEO at its finest. Invented on Facebook. No CSD category covers it, so here we are. (ie: fails general notability guidelines for a neologism) Dennis Brown (talk) 01:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete We honestly don't even need a discussion about it JayJay^{Talk to me} 01:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually we do. There isn't a category for speedy delete for WP:NEO. That is why I brought it here, I kinda said that in the nom itself. Dennis Brown (talk) 01:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know but I'm saying it shouldn't be necessary to have a AfD for such obvious topic that should be deleted JayJay^{Talk to me} 01:55, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's already covered in History of the cooperative movement A10 might have worked. Eeekster (talk) 01:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Won't break my heart if you want to tag it. Don't think it would be appropriate for me to CSD and AFD the same article. It might work, some admins will stretch A10 farther than others. Dennis Brown (talk) 02:00, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's already in AFD so speedy tagging isn't something I would do. Eeekster (talk) 02:01, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Goofy Facebook neologism by individuals who would learn much from History of the cooperative movement, for starters... Carrite (talk) 01:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Eeekster (talk) 01:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - as a hoax. →Σ τ c. 02:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. But I don't quite see it as rising to that level. But not opposed to the idea either. ;) Eeekster (talk) 03:01, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not a hoax. But an unnecessary page, considering we have the article Cooperative movement. I changed the speedy to a10--duplicate on that basis, because there's no need for a redirect from a NEO that nobody uses. DGG ( talk ) 03:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.