Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Combots (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Robot combat. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Combots[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of passing GNG. External links that are active relate to RoboGames and not Combots. LukeSurl^{t c} 20:27, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Robot combat. The organization Combots isn't notable, and the neologism isn't notable either. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:46, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Robot combat, they are basically amething and very plausible term. Similar terms like Combat robots, Combat robot and Robot fight already redirect there. –Ammarpad (talk) 21:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.