Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbia Rottweilers
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. without prejudice to the creation of a redirect Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:08, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Columbia Rottweilers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Semi-pro basketball team which does not give any evidence of notability. Also cannot find them listed on ABA's website and official website link is not working, so they maybe don't exist anymore. Mattg82 (talk) 01:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. It would be a near-miracle if a team in the American Basketball Association (2000–present) were to survive for five seasons anyway. In a typical ABA season, several teams either fold during the season or fail to begin play at all. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:58, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG with no independent coverage. Team never played. Another example of an ABA team article without coverage and without playing a game, like AfD for Atlanta Aliens earlier.—Bagumba (talk) 09:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Bagumba. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:38, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:ORG Secret account 20:27, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to American Basketball Association (2000–present). - Aside from being logical, redirects are cheap, and it keeps a redlink from tempting people. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:24, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.