Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cohen Bramall

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If the topic becomes notable later, it can be restored. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:22, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cohen Bramall[edit]

Cohen Bramall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed by IP, no reason given. Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL - it's a young footballer who received a dirge of identical WP:ROUTINE articles about his big-money transfer. Nothing which demonstrates notability. GiantSnowman 17:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator's rational and per WP:CBALL, simply too soon. The article can always be recreated or restarted if/when the subject achieves WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTY. Inter&anthro (talk) 18:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 10:13, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He's just signed for Arsenal. I rather think the demand for deletion might be premature. CulturalSnow (talk) 22:53, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - he has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.