Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cody Corbett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:13, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cody Corbett[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG with only WP:ROUTINE sources covering his comings and goings in lower minor leagues and his training camp appearances. Fails WP:NHOCKEY by not playing in a highly covered league for long enough to presume notability (he is at 93 games in the AHL and at this rate he is several years off from the 200) and has not won any major individual awards (an All-Star game appearance is the highest I found). Yosemiter (talk) 15:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This article is a start towards GNG but not enough. Rlendog (talk) 13:48, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't meet any of the notability criteria at WP:NHOCKEY and all of the coverage appears to be routine sports reporting, which means WP:GNG is also not met. Papaursa (talk) 23:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.