Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleveland Bucs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to North American Floorball League. (non-admin closure) Aasim (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cleveland Bucs

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable semi-pro teams with no WP:GNG-satisfying independent coverage whatsoever. Searches in local newspapers such as cleveland.com in the case of the Cleveland Bucs find no mentions at all of these teams. Also nominating similar pages created by the same user:

Kges1901 (talk) 16:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Kges1901 (talk) 16:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Kges1901 (talk) 16:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect all to North American Floorball League, as is normally done for teams in sports leagues where individual teams aren't individually notable. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Probably should have nominated the league first, but I have bundled the league article as well as it also attracts no independent coverage, being referenced to press releases and specialist floorball media. Kges1901 (talk) 22:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:31, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Bushranger. This might be a case of WP:TOOSOON as these teams haven't even started playing yet. Lennart97 (talk) 22:57, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: redirect which articles where? The only proposed target has been bundled into this nom
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the league article, Redirect the others The league should not have been bundled into the AfD with the Teams, it's a suitable redirect target and there's no reason to delete it that has been provided. It seems to have been thrown in hastily after someone suggested retargeting there. There is ample coverage of the league to justify keeping. Not so much the teams, yet. Maybe later, not yet. Simply WP:TOOSOON. No objection to recreating team articles once further notability is established. Smartyllama (talk) 18:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.