Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Ackerman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Ackerman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor with only 1 major starring role. Natg 19 (talk) 23:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 23:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 23:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 23:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I entirely agree as this is obvious, not notable or otherwise well-known major actor. SwisterTwister talk 04:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, has sources sources. HarrySnake (talk) 18:22, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to closer: HarrySnake is a suspected sock per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AS92813.—Bagumba (talk) 11:59, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- A list of work is simply not enough for considerable improvement. SwisterTwister talk 20:33, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:35, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 13:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete One second tier role in a film is not enough to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:43, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.