Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Bank Binondo Business Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chinabank. Tone 17:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

China Bank Binondo Business Center

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:GNG for WP:N. WP:NBUILDING states "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." From WP:BEFORE, the subject does not have WP:SIGCOV to meet this guideline. References in the article are not WP:IS. // Timothy :: talk 16:59, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 16:59, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Chinabank: Barely found anything about the building. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 15:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 15:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge important contents (esp. completion date of the building) to Chinabank and redirect. Add section on the former and current headquarters of the bank at the mother article which might serve as a guide for those who might want to upload photos of those buildings to Wikimedia sites (Commons doesn't allow photos of modern or post-November 1972 buildings from the Philippines where the copyright law has no-FoP provision). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge It seems like there should be more coverage of such an historic building, but there isn't much readily accessible online, except on the bank's website. So Merge into Chinabank per above. MB 01:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: My first choice is delete, but Merge is acceptable as a second choice. // Timothy :: talk 02:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.