Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelsea Blue (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:17, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chelsea Blue

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject no longer meets WP:PORNBIO, which guidelines are quite tighter than it was during the first AFD four years ago. Also does not meet WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in any entertainment or porn sources The Legendary Ranger (talk) 23:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 January 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- fails relevant notability guidelines and significant RS coverage not found. She was in two blockbusters movies her roles were minor. Only nominations and no awards, etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet the general notability guidelines. My general sense is we have a lot of articles on non-notable pornographic film performers. We need significant review of our articles, we have far too many on non-notable people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and per Morbidthought's analysis in the initial AFD. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 13:21, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the last AFD, Starred in various best selling shows, Meets GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 13:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The previous AfD result was "no consensus." Where are the reliable sources saying her role was more than minor? Appeared in a blockbuster is not the same as "starred in." As for GNG, no significant coverage by independent reliable sources is in evidence. • Gene93k (talk) 12:05, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - notable, in addition to being a pornstar, she appeared in many productions outside the porn industry. The article needs to be expanded, not deleted. Besides, it meets the requirements of WP:GNG. Subtropical-man (talk / en-2) 17:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails both PORNBIO and GNG. Blue was not the the star of either of the two notable movies, she just appeared in them and no reliable sourcing that addresses in more than a passing way. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 20:20, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.