Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Michael Yim

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Breathometer. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:48, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Michael Yim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Outside of Breathometer, the subject is not notable. SueDonem (talk) 00:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 00:59, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 00:59, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 00:59, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sheldybett (talk) 09:53, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:47, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I would say "Merge into Breathometer", but I don't think there's any valuable content here that's not already present in the Breathometer page. All significant coverage of Yim is in the context of covering Breathometer (with the possible exception of the Geekazine reference, which appears to be of low reliability as a source). May warrant a dedicated article in the future if more is written about him as an individual, or if he becomes involved in additional notable projects. Colin M (talk) 04:43, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Breathometer. I disagree that the Shark Tank appearance alone or in combination with the available sourcing makes him notable. There still is insufficient reliable sources for a biography. I do think that it is reasonable for someone searching for him to end up at his product, so I have a slight preference for redirecting as oppossed to deletion, but this can be deemed a delete !vote by the closer if needed to obtain consensus. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 17:56, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Breathometer (and also consider as Delete by closer if needed). Per Xymmax suggestion. Britishfinance (talk) 20:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Breathometer#Company history. I just merged some of his bio there - don't think there's anything left that should be there. Coverage is too closely affiliated with one company - not independently notable so merging makes the most sense for readers. This is a variation of WP:BLP1E that should be called BLP1C where IMHO a bio of a living person (BLP) requires more that one company (1C) to pass notability. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 21:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.