Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Baker Strahan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Biblioworm 19:47, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Baker Strahan[edit]

Charles Baker Strahan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article that's about a living person whose notability is not apparent via Google, that's been a puff-piece for years, that's been an orphan for years, and that lacks any independent source. -- Hoary (talk) 14:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 14:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 14:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 14:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for heavens sake. Unreferenced, promotional, non-notable, how in the world did we keep this here for six years? Kudos to Hoary for finding it and nominating it. --MelanieN (talk) 16:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No indication that Strahan passes GNG guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:36, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.