Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Channel Islands Tunnel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure). The consensus here is clearly in favor of keeping this article, given its significant coverage in WP:RS and accordant passage of WP:GNG. North of Eden (talk) 01:00, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Channel Islands Tunnel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a notable subject. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Subject is covered independently in multiple reliable sources, so even though it wasn't built it would seem to satisfy the General Notability Guidelines. -- Scjessey (talk) 18:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:37, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:37, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Passes GNG, sources in the fr.wikipedia article as well. Vrac (talk) 21:21, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; has sources; large transportation project proposals are notable. 331dot (talk) 21:23, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:49, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.