Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedric hanriot
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cedric hanriot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:N and WP:BIO. Article about a musician who hasn't graduated from music school yet. Jazz Revelation Records, which published his last two recordings, is the student-run studio at Berklee. None of his other recordings appear notable. The claims of appearances at "prestigious performance venues" and "major composition and solo prizes" seem dubious at best, and performing besides somebody notable does not spread notability.
No reliable third party sources found from a Google search and nothing found on google news. Themfromspace (talk) 07:26, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:59, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everything in nomination plus both labels don't have articles. Bsimmons666 (talk) 00:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails every criterion of WP:MUSIC that I can see. Nothing to suggest the awards he's won are notable, his label is clearly a very minor one, and no coverage in reliable sources to comply with WP:V. ~ mazca t|c 08:46, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.Nrswanson (talk) 10:53, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: He fails WP:MUSIC. Schuym1 (talk) 12:58, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:MUSIC. Looks okay at first glance but under scrutiny just doesn't measure up. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:25, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.