Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canary fighting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cockfight#Other bird species. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:46, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Canary fighting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a the fictional activity of Canary Fighting. The article references a single instance in the US in 2009 when Vinkensport was reported in the media using the term Canary Fighting. Fourisplenty (talk) 13:42, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but maybe with a rename to Connecticut Canary Fighting Arrest (2009) or similar. The story received attention from many reliable sources . . . that would make it notable. A quick google search turns up: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], etc.--Stvfetterly (talk) 15:13, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A single event/News article in July 2009 that was of zero lasting and historical interest and impact. Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 22:34, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12].,--BabbaQ (talk) 22:22, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:38, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Cockfight#Other bird species, where it is already mentioned. Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWSPAPER. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:44, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, per Clarityfiend. All of BabbaQ's additional refs point to the same event, so I think existing section within Cockfight article does the job. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 02:36, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per NOTNEWS to the suggested target above. All coverage is of that one event, which is certainly not notable enough in and of itself.--Yaksar (let's chat) 04:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:02, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.