Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calibre Sports

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Calibre Sports[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poor-quality article on non-notable entity (based on searches, not much third-party coverage) and also clearly written as a promotional article, based on subheading titles such as "A club in limbo", and the fact that several edits are from an account called "CalibreSport" - clearly a conflict of interest. Completely unsourced as well. Elshad (talk) 13:19, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Firearms, and Australia. Elshad (talk) 13:19, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: borderline G11. No evidence (or even claim of) notability, and involvement of COI SPA makes the choice easier. Owen× ☎ 13:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not cite any references and I could not find any SIGCOV on a basic Google search. I oppose a G11 speedy. While there is some advertising tone, this could be corrected if SIGCOV is made available and this article is kept. Frank Anchor 14:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete can't believe a poor quality unreferenced article has survived for 16 years. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 14:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: PROMO with no sourcing found. delete for lack of sourcing Oaktree b (talk) 15:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Per WP:NOTADVERTISEMENT this is unambiguous advertising. TarnishedPath^talk 09:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No RSs and unlikely to be any: WP:ROTM. Cabrils (talk) 03:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.