Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cal Simmons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:53, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cal Simmons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm unable to find significant discussion of this individual in multiple reliable sources. The Forbes article is by a "contributor" (i.e. anyone can write something) and everything else I can find in Google are directory entries. The Washington Post articles are about other things and quote/mention him as being the leader of a local chapter of an organization and having attended a conference. His book was reviewed by librarians but I don't think that is enough to sustain notability for a biography. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 19:05, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 19:07, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 19:07, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 19:07, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Mantosa (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. --K.e.coffman (talk) 06:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One for keep, two for delete (+ nom = 3).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Redditaddict69 03:39, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Roundrobinguy67 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. --K.e.coffman (talk) 06:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 05:12, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:18, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The Forbes article is an interview with someone who twice mentions Cal. This is not enough to gain notability.Jeff5102 (talk) 12:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Travel agent turned board member turned angel investor - none of which garnered SIGCOV. He could plausibly be notable (e.g. if he were press driven or we could be possibly missing archive stories from the 70s/80s/90s (actually a bit tricky for online searches) - but this has not been established.Icewhiz (talk) 14:02, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as PROMO. Forbes "article" is not a reported Forbes news article, it is a a blog post by one of the magazine's large stable of unpaid, post-at-will writers. The rest of the sources are equally poor. News archive searches turn up a couple of articles about angel investing where he is briefly quoted, but no SIGCOV, and none of the Category:Travel websites he created appear to have been notable. I guess there have been a lot of TripAdvisor wannabes, but note that the founders of TripAdvisor don't seem to have WP articles.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.