Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cage Fighting Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cage Fighting Championship[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable MMA organisation that has little or no third person sources to assert notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 23:01, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 April 5. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 23:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article has no sources or indication of why this promotion is notable. Papaursa (talk) 18:05, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources and WP:NORG says that an organization isn't notable just because notable people belong (or in the case have fought in it).Mdtemp (talk) 18:50, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.