Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cáhuil Bridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:36, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cáhuil Bridge[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An apparently unremarkable and minor road bridge of conventional construction. I just don't see the notability. Mangoe (talk) 13:57, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Definitively... keep. There are plenty of sources on-line that discuss this bridge; and there are some offline (newspapers, books), some of which state it was a "vital necessity for the inhabitants of Cáhuil and Pichilemu to connect with the southern portion of the province (of Cardenal Caro)". Some links: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11], and there are more... Cáhuil bridge was, seemingly, an emblematic construction of President Lagos government. I could not find a single English language source regarding the Cáhuil bridge. Regards, Küñall (talk) 15:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't looked at every one of these, but those that I checked seem to be routine coverage of a major road improvement project, which engenders the construction of highway bridges, of which this appears to be a typical example. Mangoe (talk) 04:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep It is strong encyclopedic knowledge. scope_creep talk 16:52, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:52, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.