Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Byss
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 08:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Byss[edit]
- Byss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No citations to third-party sources to establish notability. No reason whatsoever for this article not to fit in with the myriad other minor worlds and redirect to the Star Wars list of planets -- but User:GlassCobra has reverted redirect, so taking this to AfD to get this tripe erased and the redirect restored. --EEMIV (talk) 13:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:CRUFT. Sam Blab 13:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:38, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Star Wars planets (A-B), after cleaning-up the article. TheMoridian 09:27, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Changed to Delete, any information of worth already on List of Star Wars planets (A-B).
- The blurb already on that list is sufficient for Wikipedia's needs; no need to merge. --EEMIV (talk) 11:30, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I apologise, I scanned the contents of the list but must have missed that section. Thanks for pointing that out, TheMoridian 12:04, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The blurb already on that list is sufficient for Wikipedia's needs; no need to merge. --EEMIV (talk) 11:30, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no indication of notability outside the series. Karanacs (talk) 15:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Let's not be calling what others have written in good faith "tripe", please, even if their good faith was misguided. No opinion on deletion. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 17:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.