Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buyout (disambiguation)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ✗plicit 23:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Buyout (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another bad dab page with only two legitimate entries, for which WP:TWODABS applies. Nearly all of the other entries can be or already are mentioned in the primary topic. Clarityfiend (talk) 15:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: the PTMs seem likely topics for someone searching "Buyout". Have added "in title" and "Look from". PamD 11:17, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per PamD. The other entries are often just referred to as "buyouts" in the appropriate context (e.g. Foo NHL player's buyout would be #X over Y years), so are probably okay as entries. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 15:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as is, this is fine. BD2412 T 15:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.