Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BreezeAgent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per G3 by Reaper Eternal. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:13, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BreezeAgent[edit]

BreezeAgent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No substantial secondary coverage of this eSports participant. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 16:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's worse. The whole thing appears to be a hoax. His YouTube channel with a claimed 1+M views not only doesn't have a million views, it doesn't even have any videos published [1]. He did not compete in the Fortnite Fall Skirmish in 2018; here is Newsweek's coverage, which includes the roster for the "Rift Raiders" team that Bah claims to have been on [2]. The entire article is fabricated. I suspect this is a schoolboy's fantasy, and is should be speedily deleted as a blatant hoax. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • @The Mirror Cracked: I restored the article back to before your changes. You almost gutted the article, and after you did that it was tagged as a7. At this point in the process, if you think the article is a hoax, then you should tag it as an g3. Otherwise, your comments here are sufficient for the community to evaluate the notability of the subject.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deleted as an obvious hoax. The "references" are all created by the same person on multiple websites that allow user submissions. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.