Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breaking Laces (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW KEEP, nomination withdrawn; and kudos to the nominator for conceding they were mistaken. postdlf (talk) 14:56, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking Laces

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indications that this band has met the criteria of notability. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 03:25, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GNG and WP:BAND point 1. Multiple, non-trivial coverage in reliable sources: [1][2][3][4]. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 09:57, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Keep – Just clicking on the Google News link for this AfD discussion provides plenty of indication that this topic meets criteria 1 of WP:BAND and WP:GNG. Some of the easily-available sources prove it: [5], [6], [7] (subscription required) and [8].

– Please consider source searching prior to nominating articles for deletion, per the suggestions at WP:BEFORE, Section D. This would help to improve the encyclopedia, because articles on Wikipedia are based upon their notability, per Wikipedia guidelines. Also refer to WP:NRVE, in which topic notability is about the availability of significant coverage in reliable sources, and not based upon whether or not sources are present in articles. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Apparently I had a brain-fart when I nominated this one. My evaluation of the available sources was that they looked somewhat trivial; I realize that evaluation was wrong. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:48, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.