Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BreakTudo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 15:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BreakTudo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable, salt, burn and delete. Kavdiamanju (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article is remarkable, the site is part of one of the largest communication in Brazil that is R7.COM, is the only one that is a reference in Internet celebrities. Katyyyy 5 (talk) 22:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC) — Katyyyy 5 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:19, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:19, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:19, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The article is remarkable, the site is part of one of the largest communication in Brazil that is R7.COM, is the only one that is a reference in Internet celebrities Maria Silva 12 —Preceding undated comment added 02:27, 26 November 2016 (UTC) — Maria Silva 12 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep - I read the article and according to Wikipedia policies it is notable and should remain on the wiki. The site is one of the biggest portals of the genre entertainment of the Brazilian people, listed by sites as such and belongs to a strong communication group that is the R7. Bia Jjota —Preceding undated comment added 15:18, 27 November 2016 (UTC) — Bia Jjota (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Checkuser note: Maria Silva 12, Bia Jjota, and Katyyyy 5 are Confirmed sock puppets. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maria Dulight.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:07, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - have struck above comments. Relisting. Nordic Nightfury 15:34, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nordic Nightfury 15:34, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (possibly merge/redirect) Doesn't seem notable in its own right (I couldn't find any reliable sources). Maybe redirect/merge to Grupo Record, the article on the publisher, if that seems reasonable. R. A. Simmons ^Talk 01:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Advertising. Most of the sources given are directly connected, and the reliability of the remainder is quite doubtful. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.