Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlueFish TV (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:36, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BlueFish TV[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Inadequate referencing, but fails anyway 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Religion. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete beyond the nomination, a search identified only PRWeb and other similar churnalism. Nothing that even comes to close to WP:ORG. Star Mississippi 16:59, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If this page were to be kept, it would need to be renamed RightNow Media, which is the current company name. But a search on Newspapers.com mostly turns up passing mentions (e.g. in TV guide or Church sections listing when the media company's "Marriage Night" is being simulcast). By far the strongest piece of newspaper coverage (via Gale) was in this article about "Christianity in the Digital Age" which has two paragraphs about RNM plus a quote from a church subscriber. There is one similar paragraph in a larger article about church libraries, referring to it as "Netflix for Bible studies". Beyond that, there is a write up about Evansville Life Coaching announcing that it is partnering with RightNow, which is more about Evansville rather than RightNow, and reads a lot like a press release. It doesn't seem quite enough for notability according to WP:NCORP rules (or for updating/expanding the article), although a Google search does seem to indicate that they have a broad base of churches that subscribe. Cielquiparle (talk) 20:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.