Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beth Armstrong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. henrik•talk 14:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beth Armstrong[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist. Page created as part of a campaign to promote a particular South Africa art gallery. References are either directly from that gallery or press releases created by them. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:40, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unfortunately (though I'd love to improve the coverage of South African artists) the only significant coverage is in the Art South Africa magazine and seems to have been written by her tutor, Ashraf Jamal. Armstrong graduated in 2010 so maybe this is just a case of WP:TOOSOON. Sionk (talk) 00:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in view of the marginal notability and the apparent promotional intent of the article creation. One local magazine story is not enough for WP:GNG nor for WP:ARTIST. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.