Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Peterson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Clearly no consensus for deletion. If this should be merged, that can be discussed on the article talk page. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:31, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Peterson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Former executive director of an NGO, whose article cites exclusively primary sources and offers not a whit of reliable source coverage to properly demonstrate his notability. As always, I'm willing to withdraw this if proper sourcing can actually be added, but as a WP:BLP he's not entitled to keep this version of the article. Delete unless the sourcing can be improved. Bearcat (talk) 05:09, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 05:11, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 11th--bio and sources updated. Might now comply with standards, although this editor is new at this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrfan (talk • contribs) 16:38, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Although a couple of good citations have been added, the article is still relying mainly on primary sources — so while it's certainly a bit better than it was, it's not out of the woods yet. Bearcat (talk) 19:08, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:57, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

merge and redirect to Journalists for Human Rights whcih is where the notability and coverage is. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:39, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : In the categories of authors, he seems to be pretty notable. Last edits proves that he has been covered by multiple sources other than himself. Noteswork (talk) 12:31, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : he seems notable person--Ciofeca (talk) 13:01, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.