Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Willmore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:56, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Willmore

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable, the only references I found are already listed here, nothing else. I don't nominate articles very often so if I am doing this wrong, please correct me to the right way. Antonio Sugar Head Martin here 21:32, 31 January, 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 18:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I have found citations that I believe show the subject is notable. I'm improving the article and using reliable sources to back up statements made in the article. AuthorAuthor (talk) 17:29, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 04:56, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - AuthorAuthor's work has improved the article greatly, though I'm not seeing the relevance of source 2. But the others are just enough for me. Stalwart111 08:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Good point; I moved source 2 from references to external links. Thank you. AuthorAuthor (talk) 09:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries - I just couldn't find any mention of him on that page. But search for his name on that site and you get a few results. Stalwart111 09:39, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I am unclear as to what standard we should apply to judge Willmore's notability. The first sentence says he is a photographer, but nothing in the article suggests that he is notable as a photographer. Willmore does seem to have notability as an author of Photoshop books, but that point is not clearly made in the article. TheMindsEye (talk) 15:39, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've edited the article to make it more clear. AuthorAuthor (talk) 19:29, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. What Stalwart(111) said. -- Hoary (talk) 09:32, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.