Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bea Williams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete all, a7 no credible assertion of notability, g1 nonsense/hoax/made up. NawlinWiki 16:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bea Williams

Fails to meet notability guidelines. There are five articles linked together and to nothing else that seem to share this lack of notability. Namely Jamelia Malteser, Graham Harrington, Inzmam Ulhaq, Bea Williams and Take Me Back. They all seem edited only by two users, Ford_Prefect_2 and Beachw. Thiste 20:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sources cited to establish notability. I suspect this is part of a hoax, along with the linked articles. EALacey 21:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the whole walled garden as a hoax. Graham Harrington and Jamelia Malteser have severe WP:BLP problems if the subjects are, in fact, real people, but that's unlikely. The TV series Take Me Back somehow managed to film 78 episodes and only air one, yet for some reason it was made into a movie, which somehow is a documentary, and is BAFTA-award nomninated despite being at least a year from release. Oh yeah, and Harrington "accused the Japanese Emperor of sleeping with his wife and jay walking in Paris". Complete bollocks. —Cel ithemis 01:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. You put it very well, Celithemis! Thiste 01:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all those calling "hoax". BigHaz - Schreit mich an 08:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.