Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeIN Sports (USA)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Kurykh (talk) 03:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- BeIN Sports (USA) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
advertising The Banner talk 17:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep This line of nominations regarding BeIN is WP:BADFAITH. Obviously a notable channel with heavy cable carriage in the US; please improve your AfD choices, Banner. Nate • (chatter) 04:23, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep once again per WP:BROADCAST. And as noted by Nate, the copypaste hand-wave nomination statement "advertisement" has little chance of success, especially as it's contra policy for cable channels. If this is as much effort as you're going to devote to making a policy based case, it's a waste of everyone's time. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Strong keep for similar reasons as already mentioned (notably WP:BCAST) and that I wrote at the BeIN Sports Australia AfD by the same nominator. -- Whats new?(talk) 04:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: easily meets criteria listed in WP:BCAST for notability. musimax. (talk) 15:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep – The one-word rationale for deletion is not convincing; no qualification is provided. North America1000 16:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - This article does seem to meet the notability criteria for WP:BROADCAST.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.