Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Jazja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, let me know or go to WP:REFUND Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:45, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Jazja[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and NEVENT. Minorincident, No sources found showing this has WP:SIGCOV from WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 01:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC) // Timothy :: talk 01:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey I don't understand why this article is being deleted, could you explain what's wrong with it ? Yubudirsi (talk) 05:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see no significant notability to warrant its own article. Same goes for 2nd Battle of Yedaya Socialwave597 (talk) 06:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I added another secondary source, I think that makes 3 Yubudirsi (talk) 17:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and History. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added another secondary source Yubudirsi (talk) 17:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to assess new sources. Of course, this AFD discussion can be closed at any time. But it would be helpful to get an editor to review new content.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete though I’ve no objection to draftification. The creator appears to have gone through the chronicles and written an article about every armed conflict that ever took place between Ethiopia and Adal using the formula “battle of [place mentioned] whether the source describes that as “[battle of place mentioned]” or not. I think there is sufficient sourcing for several more broad-based articles talking about each war, or each campaign, or each period, but not one for each “battle”. This is an area of history which is currently under covered, but that isn’t a license to embroider and expand on what sources say. Draftification would allow the creator to figure out some way of repurposing the material they’ve researched and combining multiple current articles in the series they’ve created in the NPP queue, but unless they ask to do that, I agree we should delete. Mccapra (talk) 03:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There are five citations, this should pass GNG. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 03:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which of them is more than just a passing mention? What coverage is WP:INDEPTH? Mccapra (talk) 21:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.