Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bapari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 10:04, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bapari[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NMUSICIAN. CNMall41 (talk) 21:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CNMall41 (talk) 21:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Haiti and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There are several good citations papermag, Rarepeace (interview, but has a good intro that can be used towards notability, 2 writeups in Resident Advisor RA1, RA2. RA is a well known publication for EDM artists.Pershkoviski (talk) 02:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The references you cite are the exact issue here. The first two are interviews, the second two are mentions and from an unreliable sources. Please see WP:INDEPENDENT and WP:BLPSOURCES. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The interviews both have an intro which contribute towards overall notability per WP:BASIC which states if there are not enough in-depth articles, they can be combined to demonstrate notability. Pershkoviski (talk) 23:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: BLP, fails GNG and BIO. The sources listed above come the closest to meeting guidelines, but they fail Source eval:

Promo interview >> https://www.rarepeace.com/post/exploring-music-producer-bapari-and-the-brand-new-single-fusion
Promo interview >> https://www.papermag.com/bapari-no-sesso-nyfw-2020x-2640307739.html
Promo review for a song, nothing meets SIGCOV for the artist >> https://ra.co/reviews/33713
Track listing, nothing meets SIGCOV for the artist >> https://ra.co/features/3951

BEFORE and article found sources are either promotional or off-topic mentions. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV). // Timothy :: talk 19:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:32, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. The lone keep vote was rendered irrelevant by the pointing out of the fact that the sources are just interviews, or mentions in unreliable sources. Zaathras (talk) 14:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Off-wiki canvassing for this topic. - here. Zaathras (talk) 14:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.