Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autoteollisuus-Bilindustri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This does not preclude any possible MERGE. Barkeep49 (talk) 04:19, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autoteollisuus-Bilindustri

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None notable bus company that only existed for a few years in the late twenties and early thirties. Aside from the single source in the article all I could find about it was an extremely trivial mention in a book. There's not enough in-depth coverage in multiple sources out there to pass GNG or NCORP though. Adamant1 (talk) 07:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 08:26, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 08:26, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have started the article and obviously I am against the deletion. This is a spin-off from article about Sisu Auto and the reason for writing this article is keeping the main article in a decent length without missing essential information. Moreover, it links to at least five other articles. --Gwafton (talk) 09:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:11, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

merge this article and Autokoritehdasto History of Sisu Auto and split a good bit of the history section in Sisu Auto to that article as well. I don't see an independent pass of WP:NCORP or WP:GNG, but cannot read Finnish. As the creator says, the content mainly helps provide context to Sisu Auto (and the Sisu article is pretty long already), and that would be best served in a history article Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:50, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've drafted what I imagine the history article might look like at User:Eddie891/Sisu, taking bits and pieces from all the articles linked above Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:59, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Agree with Eddie891. Main page for sisu just needs history breaking down and this article merged. User:Davidstewartharvey
Keep I still stand for a separate article for Autoteollisuus-Bilindusti. Even if the history section is separated to another article and Autoteollisuus-Bilindusti is included into it, its length probably exceeds the current length of Sisu Auto. Gwafton (talk) 21:40, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.