Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austrian Biologist Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Austrian Biologist Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet the notability criteria for organizations; only sources offered are this organization's own website except for one which only establishes that it exists 331dot (talk) 20:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 00:05, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 00:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I might take the ECBA recognition more seriously if that weren't a redlink. As it is we have nothing beyond the society itself to indicate how significant it is. This is a pretty typical situation for academic societies but we can't fix that problem by allowing any society to declare itself notable only on its own say-so. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.