Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Under-16 Individual Speedway Championship (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Notability not established. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 06:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Under-16 Individual Speedway Championship[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

last AfD was no consensus but the keep arguments were far from convincing. This junior event gets no significant coverage and fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 09:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It fails WP:GNG and very little winners of the race have an article, pretty easy deletion. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 12:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply The amount of red links is not a guideline for deleting or keeping the page. And it is not an easy deletion as the previous AfD did not reach consensus.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 05:36, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:11, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable. Agree with ThePlatypusofDoom EllsworthSchmittendorf (talk) 22:09, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirict Merge prose and a list of the winners only into Australian Individual Speedway Championship. Redirect for incoming links. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 10:11, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete simply perhaps as still questionable for the needed independent notability improvements and I could've considered keeping the history with redirect but it's still questionable so delete for now. SwisterTwister talk 00:33, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.