Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Cannonball Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 14:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Cannonball Cup[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT.~~ I was only able to find a single independent source. - Mr X 10:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Insufficient coverage in reliable sources failing WP:SIGCOV. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 14:05, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: GNG is meet after receiving a notification of providing sources. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 11:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This event attracted a large amount of media attention at the time (1984), with at least 50 newspaper articles that I know of, plus television coverage. Unfortunately there is very little information online because this happened in Australia over 30 years ago. It would be a shame for there to be no record of the event here on Wikipedia because of my inexperience in Wikipedia editing. You found a reference in the Victorian Parliament documents which is surely a very reliable source. The website I linked to has many scans of newspaper articles. Can you suggest how I can save this page?Johnaau (talk) 22:21, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To keep the article you need to properly reference it, demonstrating notability as per WP:GNG. You should be able to do this by rewriting the article and using the 50 newspaper articles as in line references for each statement. Aoziwe (talk) 13:58, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PS Some sections would also be good, eg Race promotion, Race rules, Race running, Outcome. Aoziwe (talk) 14:02, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:44, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:44, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NEXIST as per newspaper articles. Aoziwe (talk) 13:58, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Meets GNG. See: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], etc. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Extensive contemporary sources linked above.- Mr X 10:43, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.