Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assembly Line Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. In the absence of reliable sources with in-depth coverage, I don't see the keep argument as persuasive. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Assembly Line Entertainment

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established- the company (as opposed to the films) only receives a passing mention in a couple of the sources. 1292simon (talk) 23:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 14:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I tried to see the production house as notable. But have found the two wiki links under filmography section Mondo Hollywoodland and Money, Fascism, and Some Sort of Acid go to Janek Ambros, don't know what that could mean and if that was inadvertent. But one could have some wrong impression that all of their films have separate page. I did not change it to let others see and judge. --☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 19:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The company has produced many notable films that justify the notability of the company. Priyanjali singh (talk) 14:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Weren't you the one who nominated Sukumar Writings and Krishna Productions for deletion even though they produced multiple notable films? -- Ab207 (talk) 20:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 14:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Fails WP:NCORP. Lack WP:SIGCOV. -Hatchens (talk) 16:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.