Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arikil Oraal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Incubate. Consensus seems to be that the article does not yet require an article (per WP:NFF), but a valid reason has been given to incubate it for future publishing. New location is Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Arikil Oraal. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 00:08, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arikil Oraal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFF. Bbb23 (talk) 23:33, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:30, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:30, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It can be inferred from the reference that the principal photography has started.Uncletomwood (talk) 13:09, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Which reference?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:09, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incubate as currently failing WP:NFF and not having enough in-depth and persistant coverage tometrit being an exception to NFF. With respects to Uncletomwood, the article's current sourcing tell us the film's title, that the blessing was held March 20, and that it will be the director's second film. None allow any inference that filming has actually commenced. Note: a pooja to bless a project is an activity that precedes actual filming. In looking for additional sourcing, we find the a series of March 2013 sources with the same predictives and nothing establishing filming having begun. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:30, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Sorry schmidt,unaware of that fact,if possible can my vote be termed invalid as per my request?Uncletomwood (talk) 14:25, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may always do a ~~strikethrough~~ of your ! vote ( begin with "<s>" and end with "</s>") and change to "incubate" or "delete". Any opinion based upon policy and guideline is valid.Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 15:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.