Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aridhu Aridhu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No real agreement that the reviews are significant enough coverage to show notability. However also no real agreement that they don't. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aridhu Aridhu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unknown film with poor sources. This film fails to establish notability. DragoMynaa (talk) 00:00, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 00:00, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 00:00, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 00:00, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:05, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or move to draft space, at least until better sources are found. Only non-duplicate sources I could find were [toxiboi 1] and [toxiboi 2], and those only mentioned the film. The articles themselves were more focused on actors.
    The current sources (in this rev) only come from two publications. I don't think the current sources in the article, nor the ones I found, really show that the movie adheres to WP:MOVIE. To quote that page, "reliable sources should have significant coverage." Not just say the film's name once and move on. –ToxiBoi! (contribs) 20:42, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.