Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archbishop Blenk High School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep per WP:SNOW and withdrawal of nomination by User:Coren, below. NawlinWiki 19:23, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Archbishop Blenk High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – Editor deleted
{{prod}}without adding claims of notability, but article about a school that doesn't appear to meet WP:SCHOOL. Google returns no relevant sources outside the high school itself. Coren 03:48, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per A7. Sr13 (T|C) ER 06:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and improve — adequate article about a valid H.S. with 800+ students. — RJH (talk) 17:13, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, high school in N'awlins, notable because of controversy over its merger (as now supported by sources cited in article). NawlinWiki 17:46, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Article needs work, but controversy over the merger has certainly gained independent attention (e.g., [1], [2]). EALacey 19:23, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article has expanded since oringal entry.
- Keep Article has indeed been prodded into growing. (Only fools never change their minds). Coren 22:44, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep School has been recognized by the Blue Ribbon Schools Program, the nations top honor for a school. Additional cleanup and improvement is still strongly suggested, but the article stands on its own in demonstrating notability. Alansohn 03:15, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Butseriouslyfolks 03:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep because of Blue Ribbon and other significant and cited news coverage satisfying WP:N and WP:V. --Butseriouslyfolks 03:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.