Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anyoption

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm closing this as delete, but treating it as a prod. There was only one !vote, and it appears to mainly go towards Anyoption. There have been 2 relists, and the last one didn't garner any additional participation. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 13:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anyoption[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP notability. This article was created by a promotional editor (now blocked) with absurdly weak sources, mostly Forex websites deemed non-reliable at RSN in a September 2016 thread.

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are part of a circle of Belize/Cyprus financial entity related promotion by several other socks (see September 2016 COIN thread), with identical sourcing issues plus vague assertions of awards from non-notable sources:

IQ Option (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Justforex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

— Brianhe (talk) 02:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Brianhe (talk) 02:23, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete the awards themselves are not significant, so at this stage I do not yet see them as having sufficient notability. That their url ends up on the blacklist makes them more spam than ham. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Billinghurst: Note that three articles are nominated for deletion herein. Your !vote comes across that it may be only about the Anyoption article listed at the very top of this page, per the singular grammar used in your !vote. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:38, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everyone! Does anyone know why the official website (iqoption.com) is blacklisted and how can I remove it from the blacklist? I'm currently trying to make this article more relevant and source-based. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rrusl u (talk • contribs) 14:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that a total of three articles are nominated for deletion in this discussion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:33, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:33, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.