Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Stolli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Stolli

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2016. No prose, but simply a list of credits which makes this akin to a WP:RESUME for an actor as opposed to encyclopedia entry. Not clear the subject passes WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 03:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Music, Theatre, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment.I believe that this article is worthy of being kept. It has 12 different footnotes and would seem to, therefore be relevant. Also, Anna Stolli is mentioned by name in the online footnoted references. --Howard352 (talk) 20:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The citations are mainly to self published and primary sources. We require independent secondary references to prove notability per WP:GNG. The few secondary references that are there only mention the actress briefly in cast lists, and do not address Stolli's work as an actress in detail as required by WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 21:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:38, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unable to find significant coverage in independent sources.— Moriwen (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are many sources on the internet about her work, but none of them are independent sources unfortunately.Contributor892z (talk) 00:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.