Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel of Anywhere

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Angel of Anywhere

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unremarkable film. Zero news hits. Legacypac (talk) 06:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No mentions anywhere other than IMDb; as such falls well short of WP:GNG --Hazarasp (talk) 14:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:22, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it might just be too soon. There is at least one James Kicklighter that is notable. Delete or userfy if the creator wishes. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:25, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

alts:

year:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete for now per being premature. Slated for a 2017 release, we have no sourcing showing it as released or receiving adequate coverage. If author wishes it back as a draft, that'd be fine. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:46, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.