Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Baldwin (baseball)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Minnesota Twins minor league players. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Baldwin (baseball)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Giants27(T|C) 02:37, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. —Giants27(T|C) 02:41, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. —Giants27(T|C) 02:41, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep IMO he meets WP:MLB/N#6. But in lieu of deleting maybe the basic info should be merged to Minnesota Twins minor league players? CRRays Head90 | ^{Another way...} 05:03, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Minnesota Twins minor league players because I believe he fails WP:GNG and WP:MLB/N, but he's still active. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:07, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Minnesota Twins minor league players. Fails WP:MLB/N having not played in major league yet. Fails WP:GNG requiring multiple sources of non-routine coverage in independent sources.—Bagumba (talk) 09:09, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't see where you have to play in the majors to be notable. CRRays Head90 | ^{Another way...} 10:13, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't need to have played in the majors, but MLB/N#6 is a (poorly) summarized version of GNG, which he fails without multiple, non-routine source.—Bagumba (talk) 15:07, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Minnesota Twins minor league players. Alex (talk) 11:58, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.