Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anasuya Sengupta
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) KCVelaga (talk) 02:26, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Anasuya Sengupta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A trivial case of BLP1E, wherein all mentions in reliable media-units mention her in the context of one of the lines of her poem being recited by Clinton.
What else?! (Random interviews don't add any to notability.)
I see that the creator does seem to possess an extreme adulation for wikimedia-personalities.∯WBGconverse 14:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, Winged Blades of Godric. I take umbrage at your scurrilous comment about "extreme adulation" – and it is a cheap shot to link to an ANI. Please redact this off-topic comment. I consider it to be a personal attack. Thank you. Having fun! Cheers!
{{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}
08:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, Winged Blades of Godric. I take umbrage at your scurrilous comment about "extreme adulation" – and it is a cheap shot to link to an ANI. Please redact this off-topic comment. I consider it to be a personal attack. Thank you. Having fun! Cheers!
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, well referenced article about a person and a poem which had an effect on international relations and a book by Hillary Clinton. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:02, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Randy Kryn, WP:BLP1E? And, we're meeting after a long time:-) ∯WBGconverse 15:13, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, you are a memorable editor. The one event is a pretty good one, and she has done other things, including a stint as a Wikimedia official. Wikipedia is now set-in-stone enough in society that people who've worked there, or made major accomplishments here, should be as notable as any other participants of a unique knowledge force. The sources and references are strong. I don't get the reasoning of one-event guidelines, although I haven't memorized it. Seems many people are justifiably notable for one event, and then we have major league baseball, where if a person under a major-league contract walks on the field for one inning and then is never heard of or never does anything notable again they are automatically considered notable and article-worthy. Being the catalyst for Hillary Clinton, in events aimed to shift the public's perception and actions towards women in society, "ain't nuttin to sneeze at". Randy Kryn (talk) 17:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:21, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Enough coverage and beyond BLP1E too. The subject has received International media including BBC[1] and NYT coverage for her Poem used and recited by Clinton.[2] Other than that, Coverage in BBC for her work in Wikimedia[3] she has been covered for her social work in support of women and her NGO.[4][5] Has been a speaker at summits Mozilla and MIT.[6][7][8]--DBigXrayᗙ 20:26, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
References
- ^ Beary, Habib (June 27, 2003). "Indian's silence speaks to Hillary". BBC News. Archived from the original on June 10, 2004. Retrieved November 26, 2017.
- ^ Chakravarthy, Smitha (August 7, 2003). "The Hindu : A poem that moved a Clinton". The Hindu. Archived from the original on January 17, 2004. Retrieved November 26, 2017.
- ^ "Who edits Wikipedia?, Newshour - BBC World Service". BBC.
- ^ "Anasuya Sengupta - SheSource Expert - Women's Media Center". www.womensmediacenter.com.
- ^ "Anasuya Sengupta Wants to Diversify Wikipedia - The Teal Mango". 1 August 2018.
- ^ Mozilla (27 February 2018). "How to Build an Internet With Us, Not For Us - Anasuya Sengupta and Siko Bouterse at MozFest" – via YouTube.
- ^ "Grand Challenges Summit keynote: Anasuya Sengupta by MIT Webcast".
- ^ MITLibraries (25 June 2018). "Grand Challenges Keynote: Anasuya Sengupta" – via YouTube.
- Keep I struggled to find good sources, but I've identified a few and expanded the article a bit. I'm confident that improvement, not deletion, is the answer here. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:37, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment this is a case of borderline-notability for a person affiliated with the Foundation. It is definitely not a WP:BLP1E. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:55, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete There is no strong claim to notability and the article itself with mentions of Wikipedia connections adds up to navel gazing on Wikipedia's part.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:11, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- The amount of coverage in this article dealing with Wikipedia amounts to one small sentence. Most of the article has nothing to do with it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:43, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Once you negate that, it shifts to a BLP1E case or so I believe.I'll try to provide a detailed analysis of available sourcing, though... ∯WBGconverse 11:45, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- The amount of coverage in this article dealing with Wikipedia amounts to one small sentence. Most of the article has nothing to do with it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:43, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Good sourcing and I've found reviews of more of her work. Passes GNG and probably CREATIVE. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:25, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The subject has received significant coverage in recent years and thus meets the criteria set forth in WP:GNG. MBlaze Lightning 06:15, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: meets WP:CREATIVE per review of available sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:GNG. Sources mentioned in RS are reliable. Accesscrawl (talk) 13:44, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep –
{{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}
07:57, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.