Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anıl Ulaş Övençoğlu (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:30, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anıl Ulaş Övençoğlu

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. UtherSRG (talk) 20:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Business, and Turkey. UtherSRG (talk) 20:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Haberler is considered to be unreliable on the Turkish Wikipedia, especially for biographies. The Haber7 source is just plain gossip that doesn't even verify the statement it's used for. This one is about him receiving a non-notable award which 156 people got at the same time, and very suspiciously he is the only one that got a newspaper article written about it. There is this source from Posta, but that very clearly says that it's an advertisement (the "İlandır" at the very bottom). Very likely that the sources are paid-for, so I don't see any reliable, independent and significant coverage, thus this person fails the GNG. ~Styyx^Talk? 22:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - After removing unreliable citations and advertisements the entire article is just 3 sentences long and is useless. After finding all of the problems with this page, the "multiple issues" box contains more words than the entire article itself. BenzoAid (talk) 10:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

EVEN THE IMAGE GOT REMOVED. BenzoAid (talk) 10:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the first AfDD did end in soft delete. It was deleted, then restored on the very next day by the same guy who created the page. Interesting. // 💪Benzo💪 (Send me a message!) (Here's what I've contributed.) 11:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted on 23 Mar when the first AFD was closed. It was restored 24 Mar after this request]. ~ GB fan 12:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC):My comment was made when the previous comnment said the article was never deleted after the last afd. ~ GB fan 12:41, 27 March 2023 (UTC) [reply]

Delete per above. BLPs need clearly IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse. // Timothy :: talk 14:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.