Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Miller (model) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 18:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Miller (model)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Playboy model (web, not magazine). Fails WP:PORNBIO and WP:GNG. Recent AfD was marred by procedural concerns which do not apply in this renomination. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:13, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

redirect and merge to the list. Person of limited notability as represented by the limited coverage about her life. Off2riorob (talk) 14:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This appears to be a legitimate nomination, unlike the prior nomination. Subject is borderline notable at best.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 15:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and per my comments at the prior AFD, article is one of the few surviving members of a class (Playboy "Cyber Girls") that was determined by consensus to be insufficiently notable absent substantial independent credits, which this model clearly lacks. Prior AFD was a debacle, and was censored after its close by an IP sock of an indef-blocked user who had participated in it. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:46, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, with perhaps a redirect instated afterwards pointing at the list. Is not notable, but may be listed on a disambiguation page for Amy Miller. Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:38, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The actress is up for deletion too now, so that disambiguation page may need to be deleted later. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:49, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
redirect and merge per Off2riorob --Cavarrone (talk) 13:07, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.